Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
DHS17 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 311 Appeal from: NLJV and Minister for Home Affairs (Migration) [2019] AATA 3646
File number: NSD 1744 of 2019
Judge: JAGOT J
Date of judgment: 12 March 2020
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – application for judicial review – whether Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) made jurisdictional error in determining applicant's sexuality – breach of obligation to provide fair and meaningful hearing – procedural fairness – reliance upon evidence not directed to the applicant's sexuality unreasonable – illogical inference – where makers of statements are not called for cross-examination – weight to be given to evidence is a matter for the AAT – application dismissed
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 501(3A)
Cases cited: Abebe v Commonwealth [1999] HCA 14; (1999) 197 CLR 510 Commissioner for Australian Capital Territory Revenue v Alphaone Pty Ltd (1994) 49 FCR 576 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZGUR [2011] HCA 1; (2011) 241 CLR 594 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZJSS [2010] HCA 48; (2010) 243 CLR 164 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZMDS [2010] HCA 16; (2010) 240 CLR 611 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZNSP [2010] FCAFC 50; (2010) 184 FCR 485 Sullivan v Civil Aviation Safety Authority [2014] FCAFC 93; (2014) 226 FCR 555 Sullivan v Department of Transport (1978) 1 ALD 383 SBLF v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2008] FCA 1219 SZBEL v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2006] HCA 63; (2006) 228 CLR 152
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate