Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
DVD16 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 332 Appeal from: Application for a Constitutional writ: DVD16 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2019] FCCA 1960
File number(s): NSD 1232 of 2019
Judge(s): PERRY J
Date of judgment: 13 March 2020
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal from Federal Circuit Court dismissing judicial review application of decision of Immigration Assessment Authority (IAA) affirming decision not to grant appellant a safe haven visa – where failure by FCC following ex tempore decision to publish written reasons until after expiry of the appeal period despite observations in CQX18 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCAFC 386 - where FCC wrongly held mere identification by IAA of an integer of a claim to fear harm was sufficient - whether IAA failed to consider claim to fear harm by reason of appellant's campaign to close an army facility as a stand-alone claim – whether claim arose squarely on material before the IAA or was made only as an integer of a claim to fear harm by reason of imputed political opinion – whether finding on particular claim subsumed into findings of greater generality – whether IAA failed to engage intellectually with the requirements of s 473DD with respect to new information – appeal allowed
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 5H, 5J, 35A, 36(2), 36(2A), Part 7AA
Cases cited: BVZ16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 958; (2017) 254 FCR 221 BYA17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCAFC 44 (BYA17) Carrascalao v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCAFC 107; (2017) 252 FCR 352 CQX18 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCAFC 386 CTY15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCA 197; 163 ALD 590 Dranichnikov v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2003] HCA 26; 214 CLR 496 EPT17 v Minister for Immigration [2019] FCA 570 Iyer v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1788 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v AMA16 [2017] FCAFC 136; (2017) 254 FCR 534 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v BBS16 [2017] FCAFC 176; (2017) 257 FCR 111 NABE v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (No 2) [2004] FCAFC 263; (2004) 144 FCR 1 NAJT v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCAFC 134; (2005) 147 FCR 51 Plaintiff M174/2016 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] HCA 16; (2018) 264 CLR 217 Singh v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCAFC 195 VUAX v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs (2004) 238 FCR 588 WAEE v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 184; (2003) 236 FCR 593
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate