Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Salh v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2020] FCA 349 Appeal from: Salh & Anor v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2019] FCCA 2096
File number: NSD 1361 of 2019
Judge: MURPHY J
Date of judgment: 18 March 2020
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal from decision of Federal Circuit Court which dismissed application for review of a decision by the Migration Review Tribunal to affirm a decision to not grant the appellants Temporary Business Entry (457) visas – where the Tribunal was not satisfied that the first appellant has the skills, qualifications and employment background necessary to perform the tasks of the nominated occupation – whether the Tribunal denied the appellants natural justice, failed to accord them procedural fairness, or acted in a way that was legally unreasonable – appeal dismissed
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth)
Cases cited: Hossain v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] HCA 34; (2018) 264 CLR 123 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZSRS [2014] FCAFC 16; (2014) 309 ALR 67 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf [2001] HCA 30; (2001) 206 CLR 323 Minister for Immigration v SZMDS [2010] HCA 16; (2010) 240 CLR 611 NAJT v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCAFC 134; (2005) 147 FCR 51 Singh v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 389; (2001) 109 FCR 152 SZBYR v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] HCA 26; (2007) 235 ALR 609 SZMCD v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2009] FCAFC 46; (2009) 174 FCR 415
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate