Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Kumar v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 355 File number(s): QUD 269 of 2019
Judge(s): COLLIER J
Date of judgment: 18 March 2020
Catchwords: MIGRATION – originating application under s 39B of Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) for review of decision of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia (FCCA) dismissing an application for extension of time – whether judicial review application has merit – whether Federal Circuit Court erred in approach – no arguable legal or jurisdictional error established – application dismissed
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 24(1A) Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 91J, 91K, 477
Cases cited: Commissioner of Taxation v Futuris Corporation Limited (2008) 237 CLR 146; [2008] HCA 32 DMI16 v Federal Circuit Court of Australia (2018) 264 FCR 454; [2018] FCAFC 95 Kirk v Industrial Court of New South Wales (2010) 239 CLR 531; [2010] HCA 1 Kumar v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCCA 1505 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Kim (2014) 221 FCR 523; [2014] FCAFC 47 SZTES v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 719 Tang v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2013) 217 FCR 55; [2013] FCAFC 139
Date of hearing: 2 March 2020
Date of last submissions: 2 March 2020
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate