Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
GPV18 v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCA 393 Appeal from: Application for leave to appeal: GPV18 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCCA 1563
File number: NSD 971 of 2019
Judge: WIGNEY J
Date of judgment: 26 March 2020
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for leave to appeal – whether substantial injustice would result if leave were refused assuming decision at first instance was wrong – whether decision at first instance was attended with sufficient doubt to justify its reconsideration on appeal – whether primary judge was correct to find that applicant's proposed grounds of review had no apparent merit or demonstrated an arguable case for relief sought – where applicant failed to identify any arguable ground of appeal in relation to dismissal of application by primary judge – where no meaningful submissions advanced in support of application – application dismissed MIGRATION – application for leave to appeal from decision of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia – where primary judge dismissed judicial review application of decision by Immigration Assessment Authority – where Immigration Assessment Authority affirmed decision to refuse a protection visa – application dismissed
Legislation: Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001 (Cth) rr 13.03C(1)(c), 16.05(2)(c) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 24(1A) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 35.12(2)(d) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 473BB, 473CA, 473CB, 473CC, 473DA, 473DB, 473DC, 473DC(1), 473DC(2), 473DC(3), 473DD, 473DF, 473EB, 473EB(3), 473FA(1), 473FA(2), 473GA, 473GB, 476, 476(1), 477, 477(2)(a), Pt 7AA Div 3
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate