Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Rizkallah v Tax Practitioners Board [2020] FCA 431 File number(s): NSD 110 of 2020
Judge: GRIFFITHS J
Date of judgment: 17 March 2020
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – application for judicial review seeking relief against a decision of the Tax Practitioners Board terminating the registration as a tax agent of both applicants – parallel proceedings in Administrative Appeals Tribunal which provided a full merits review – application for judicial review dismissed
Legislation: Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth), s 10(2)(b)(ii) Public Service Act 1922 (Cth) Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth), s 39B
Cases cited: Bragg v Secretary Department of Employment, Education and Training [1995] FCA 372; 59 FCR 31
Date of hearing: 17 March 2020
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Taxation
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 10
Counsel for the Applicants: M. Cashion SC
Solicitor for the Applicants: Penhall & Co Lawyers
Counsel for the Respondent: G. O'Mahoney
Solicitor for the Respondent: Australian Government Solicitor
ORDERS NSD 110 of 2020
BETWEEN: SAM RIZKALLAH First Applicant
LE'SAM ACCOUNTING PTY LTD Second Applicant
AND: TAX PRACTITIONERS BOARD Respondent
JUDGE: GRIFFITHS J DATE OF ORDER: 17 MARCH 2020
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The originating application be dismissed. 2. No order as to costs. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate