Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Booth v Thorne [2020] FCA 445 File number: VID 126 of 2020
Judge: ANASTASSIOU J
Date of judgment: 6 March 2020
Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – control orders – application for interim control orders pursuant to s 104.4 of the Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) – whether methodology for risk assessment reliable – whether controls reasonably necessary and reasonably appropriate and adapted – application granted
Legislation: Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth), ss 11.2A, 104.1, 104.4, and 119.4 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), s 37AI Federal Court Rules 2011, r 41.06
Cases cited: Booth v Kaya [2020] FCA 25 Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336 McCartney v EB (2019) 263 FCR 170 R v Cerantonio & Ors [2019] VSC 284 Thomas v Mowbray (2007) 233 CLR 307 Wong v The Queen (2001) 207 CLR 584
Date of hearing: 4 and 6 March 2020
Registry: Victoria
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Federal Crime and Related Proceedings
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 20
Counsel for the Applicant: Ms C Fitzgerald
Solicitor for the Applicant: Australian Government Solicitor
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr S Moglia
Solicitor for the Respondent: Doogue + George
ORDERS VID 126 of 2020
BETWEEN: SANDRA BOOTH Applicant
AND: SHAYDEN JAMIL THORNE Respondent
JUDGE: ANASTASSIOU J DATE OF ORDER: 6 MARCH 2020
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate