Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Aurora Funds Management Limited v Australian Government Takeovers Panel (Judicial Review) [2020] FCA 496 Review of: Molopo Energy Limited 03R, 04R & 05R [2017] ATP 12
File number: NSD 1583 of 2017
Judge: PERRAM J
Date of judgment: 17 April 2020
Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – application for judicial review of a decision of Australian Government Takeovers Panel – where Panel found Applicant and Fourth Respondent were associates under Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 12(2) – where Panel declared unacceptable circumstances in relation to affairs of Third Respondent under s 657A – where remedial orders made under s 657D – whether findings of association under ss 12(2)(b) or (c) require findings of express communication between parties – whether Panel made findings of effect justifying declaration of unacceptable circumstances under s 657A – whether Panel had proper regard to purposes of Act ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – bias – where Sitting President of Panel contemporaneously briefed as senior counsel in Supreme Court of New South Wales proceeding involving no parties to present proceeding – where Fifth Respondent a director of party to Supreme Court proceeding – where Fifth Respondent's credit said to be impugned by position of Sitting President's client in Supreme Court proceeding – where Sitting President had done no work on brief at time of Panel's decision – whether reasonable apprehension of bias – consideration of extent of knowledge of fair-minded lay observer PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – where hearing re-opened to allow for additional ground of review – where leave to raise two additional formulations of ground refused – consideration of relevant principles
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate