Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Rauland Australia Pty Ltd v Law [2020] FCA 516 File number: NSD 1914 of 2018
Judge: STEWART J
Date of judgment: 21 April 2020
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for leave to issue a subpoena and serve it in New Zealand – whether to grant leave to serve a subpoena in New Zealand under the Trans-Tasman Proceedings Act 2010 (Cth) – applicable test – apparent relevance and significance of the documents sought – too tenuous – leave refused
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 24.01, 34.66, 34.67, 42.12 Trans-Tasman Proceedings Act 2010 (Cth) s 31
Cases cited: Chamberlain Group Pty Ltd v Kids for Life Academy Pty Ltd [2015] NSWCA 241 Comeskey v New South Wales Bar Association [2015] NSWSC 12 Foster v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2014] FCA 240; 219 FCR 563 King (Trustee), in the matter of Zetta Jet Pte Ltd v Linkage Access Ltd [2019] FCA 1408 Labruyere v Parsons Brinckerhoff Australia Pty Ltd (No 3) [2019] NSWSC 79 Rauland NZ Limited v Delvo [2018] NZEmpC 153 Stokes (by a tutor) v McCourt [2013] NSWSC 1014 Wong v Sklavos [2014] FCAFC 120; 319 ALR 378
Date of hearing: Determined on the papers
Date of last submissions: 2 April 2020
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Intellectual Property
Sub-area: Copyright and Industrial Designs
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate