Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Norman v Staatz, in the matter of Wollumbin Horizons Pty Ltd (in liq) [2020] FCA 521 Appeal from: Staatz v Berry, in the matter of Wollumbin Horizons Pty Ltd (in liq) (No 3) [2019] FCA 924
File number: QUD 429 of 2019
Judge: REEVES J
Date of judgment: 22 April 2020
Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – appeal from a judgment of the Federal Court of Australia – where directions were given by the Court to the liquidator about the liquidation of the company – where appellant attempted to introduce other issues in that application – where the appellant failed to identify error in the primary judgment – appeal dismissed PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application by the liquidator for summary judgment under s 31A of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) – whether the appeal has reasonable prospects of success – application granted
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) Real Property Act 1900 (NSW) Trustee Act 1925 (NSW)
Cases cited: Eliezer v University of Sydney (2015) 239 FCR 381; [2015] FCA 1045 Kimber v Owners of Strata Plan No 48216 (2017) 258 FCR 575; [2017] FCAFC 226 Kulik v Administrative Appeals Tribunal [2009] FCA 1324 Staaz v Berry, in the matter of Wollumbin Horizons Pty Ltd (in liq) ([2018] FCA 1090) Staatz v Berry, in the matter of Wollumbin Horizons Pty Ltd (in liq) (No 3) [2019] FCA 924
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate