Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Grapsas v Minister for Infrastructure and Regional Development [2020] FCA 525 Appeal from: Grapsas and Minister for Infrastructure and Regional Development [2017] AATA 886
File number: VID 739 of 2017
Judge: WHEELAHAN J
Date of judgment: 23 April 2020
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – appeal from decision of Administrative Appeals Tribunal – importation of motor vehicle – Tribunal declined to exercise discretion pursuant to regs 11 and 13 of the Motor Vehicle Standards Regulations 1989 (Cth) – interpretation of reg 13(1)(ac) – application of the broad discretion in reg 11 – application by way of appeal dismissed.
Legislation: Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) s 13 Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) ss 37, 43 and 44 Legislation Act 2003 (Cth), s 13 Motor Vehicle Standards Act 1989 (Cth) ss 3 and 18 Motor Vehicle Standards Amendment Regulations 2009 (No 1) (Cth) Motor Vehicle Standards Regulations 1989 (Cth) regs 11 and 13
Cases cited: Akiba v The Commonwealth [2013] HCA 33; 250 CLR 209 Alcan (NT) Alumina Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Territory Revenue (Northern Territory) [2009] HCA 41; 239 CLR 27 Applicant WAEE v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 184; 236 FCR 593 Berenguel v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2010] HCA 8; 264 ALR 417 Browne v Dunn (1893) 6 R 67 Comcare v Etheridge [2006] FCAFC 27; 149 FCR 522 Commissioner of Taxation of The Commonwealth of Australia v Unit Trend Services Pty Ltd [2013] HCA 16; 250 CLR 523 Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Mammoet Australia Pty Ltd [2013] HCA 36; 248 CLR 619 Country Roads Board v Neale Ads Pty Ltd [1930] HCA 5; 43 CLR 126 CPB Contractors Pty Limited v Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union [2019] FCAFC 70 Dranichnikov v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2003] HCA 26; 77 ALJR 1088 Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Consolidated Media Holdings Ltd [2012] [HCA] 55; 250 CLR 503 Kentucky Fried Chicken Pty Ltd v Gantidis [1979] HCA 20; 140 CLR 675 Kowald and Minister for Infrastructure [2010] AATA 1018 Li v Chief of Army [2013] HCA 49; 250 CLR 328 Miller and Minister for Infrastructure [2010] AATA 608 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Maioha [2018] FCAFC 216; 267 FCR 643 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Singh [2014] FCAFC 1; 231 FCR 437 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Stretton [2016] FCAFC 11; 237 FCR 1 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li [2013] HCA 18; 249 CLR 382 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang [1996] HCA 6; 185 CLR 259 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf [2001] HCA 30; 206 CLR 323 Reece v Webber [2011] FCAFC 33; 192 FCR 254 Re Liden and Minister for Infrastructure [2012] AATA 280; 133 ALD 418 Roy Morgan Research Centre Pty Ltd v Commissioner of State Revenue [2001] HCA 49; 207 CLR 72 Selway v Minister for Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development and Local Government [2011] FCA 43; 120 ALD 40 Silk Bros Pty Ltd v State Electricity Commission (Vic) [1943] HCA 2; 67 CLR 1 SZBEL v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2006] HCA 63; 228 CLR 152 SZTAL v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] HCA 34; 262 CLR 362 Bennion on Statutory Interpretation (5th Edition)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate