Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Tumaialu v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCA 529 Appeal from: Application for extension of time: Tumaialu v Minister for Home Affairs & Anor [2019] FCCA 582
File number: QUD 216 of 2019
Judge: RANGIAH J
Date of judgment: 2 April 2020
Catchwords: MIGRATION – application for extension of time to file notice of appeal – where proposed appeal has insufficient prospects of success – application dismissed
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 116(1)(e)(ii) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 36.03
Date of hearing: 2 April 2020
Registry: Queensland
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 21
Counsel for the Appellant: The appellant appeared in person
Counsel for the First Respondent: Mr J Kyranis
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Sparke Helmore
Counsel for the Second Respondent: The Second Respondent filed a submitting notice
ORDERS QUD 216 of 2019
BETWEEN: TIMO TUMAIALU Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR HOME AFFAIRS First Respondent
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL Second Respondent
JUDGE: RANGIAH J DATE OF ORDER: 2 APRIL 2020
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application for an extension of time to file a notice of appeal is dismissed. 2. The applicant pay the first respondent's costs of the appeal. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate