Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Boomerang Investments Pty Ltd v Padgett (Liability) [2020] FCA 535 File number: NSD 1738 of 2017
Judge: PERRAM J
Date of judgment: 24 April 2020
Catchwords: COPYRIGHT – musical works – identification of copyright work – whether sound of lyrics as sung forms part of musical work – 'love is in the air' as both lyric carrying meaning and phonetic instruction to vocalist – objective similarity between copyright work and allegedly infringing works – consideration of ordinary, reasonably experienced listener – relevance of expert evidence and chambers' heightened familiarity with works – causal connection – whether conscious or unconscious copying – consideration of process of creation of allegedly infringing works – whether part taken a substantial part of copyright work – originality – whether sung lyric 'love is in the air' and accompanying music 'essential air' of copyright work – whether part taken 'too short' to be substantial COPYRIGHT – musical works – where allegedly infringing works created outside Australia – where reproduction and communication rights alleged to have been infringed by streaming, downloading and telephone hold music – effect of assignment and licensing arrangements – whether authorisation infringement possible without primary infringement COPYRIGHT – literary works – whether lyric reproduced in allegedly infringing works a substantial part of literary work – originality of lyric taken – whether 'love is in the air' an obvious, commonplace or prosaic expression COPYRIGHT – moral rights – right not to have work subjected to derogatory treatment – meaning of 'reputation' and 'honour' – consideration of territoriality requirements CONTRACTS – construction of assignment and licensing arrangements concerning rights in copyright work and allegedly infringing works involving Fourth and Fifth Applicants – relevance of extrinsic materials – effect on standing of First Applicant to sue DAMAGES – whether sufficient prospect of entitlement to real pecuniary award to justify inquiry for damages or account of profits – entitlement to additional damages – whether copying flagrant – where further hearing as to relief necessary EVIDENCE – standard of proof in civil proceedings – allegations of conscious copying and falsified evidence – gravity of allegations – Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 140 PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for leave to file rejoinder submissions – where various complaints made about nature and quality of Reply submissions – consideration of standard for leave to be granted
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate