Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Wood v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 566 File number: QUD 774 of 2019
Judge: LOGAN J
Date of judgment: 26 March 2020
Catchwords: MIGRATION – where applicant's visa was cancelled under s 501(3A) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) (the Act) – where Minister refused to revoke visa cancellation decision under s 501CA(4) of the Act – whether application for an extension of time within which to file originating application should be granted – whether Minister's decision was arbitrary, capricious and legally unreasonable
Legislation: Constitution Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 501, 501CA
Cases cited: Attorney-General (NSW) v Quin (1990) 170 CLR 1 AZAFQ v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2016) 243 FCR 451 Chu Kheng Lim v Minister for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs (1992) 176 CLR 1 Ham v Tax Practitioners Board (2018) 108 ATR 869 Khalil v Minister for Home Affairs (2019) 372 ALR 424 Love v Commonwealth of Australia [2020] HCA 3 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Haq (2019) 365 ALR 202 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Stretton (2016) 237 FCR 1 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZVFW (2018) 264 CLR 541 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li (2013) 249 CLR 332 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259 Moana v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2016) 230 FCR 367 Nolan v Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs (1988) 165 CLR 178 Re Patterson; Ex Parte Taylor (2001) 207 CLR 391 Shaw v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2003) 218 CLR 28
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate