Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
ERY19 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 569 File number: NSD 1964 of 2019
Judge: STEWART J
Date of judgment: 4 May 2020
Catchwords: MIGRATION – judicial review of Minister's decision under s 501(1) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) to refuse the applicant a protection visa on character grounds – whether Minister properly applied s 501(6)(h) – whether Minister reasonably drew the inference from an Interpol Red Notice that the applicant would be a risk to the Australian community or a segment of that community– whether Minister was obliged to consider country information available to a Departmental officer and whether Minister's acceptance that Australia has non-refoulement obligations in respect of the applicant was sufficient consideration of the consequences of the Minister's decision – whether Minister's decision was legally unreasonable – decision set aside
Legislation: Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Act 1979 (Cth) s 4 Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 24, 36(2)(aa), 116(1)(e), 129(1)(e), 134B(b), 140XG(1), 268BK(1), 268CL(2), 370(2), 371(3), 432(2), 433(3), 487C(1), 499, 501(1), 501(3), 501(6), 501CA, 503(3)
Cases cited: Applicant M 117 of 2007 v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2008] FCA 1838 Attorney-General (NSW) v Quin [1990] HCA 21; 170 CLR 1 BAL19 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 2189 Bochenski v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCAFC 68; 250 FCR 209 Carrascalao v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCAFC 107 DHS17 v Assistant Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 209Dranichnikov v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2003] HCA 26; 197 ALR 389 FUD18 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 1858 FYBR v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCAFC 185; 374 ALR 601 Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend [1986] HCA 40; 162 CLR 24 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Singh [2014] FCAFC 1; 231 FCR 437 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZMTA [2019] HCA 3; 264 CLR 421 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZVFW [2018] HCA 30; 357 ALR 408 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li [2013] HCA 18; 249 CLR 332 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZMDS [2010] HCA 16; 240 CLR 611 Tickner v Chapman [1995] FCA 987; 57 FCR 451 Oxford English Dictionary Online (Oxford University Press, March 2020)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate