Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Rossi v Qantas Airways Limited [2020] FCA 573 File number: NSD 1549 of 2019
Judge: GLEESON J
Date of judgment: 1 May 2020
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – third party application for leave to inspect statement of claim – whether a document unrestricted under Federal Court Rules 2011 r 2.32(2), in advance of leave to make application to Federal Court under Australian Human Rights Commission Act 1986 (Cth) s 46PO(3A)(a) – application granted
Legislation: Australian Human Rights Commission Act 1986 (Cth) ss 46PO(1), (3A)(a) Federal Court Rules 2011 rr 2.32(2), (4); 34.163
Cases cited: Oldham v Capgemini Australia Pty Ltd (No 2) [2016] FCA 1101 Reynolds v JP Morgan Administrative Services Australia Limited (No 2) and Another [2011] FCA 489; (2011) 193 FCR 507
Date of hearing: 23 April 2020
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 30
Counsel for the Applicant: K Edwards
Solicitor for the Applicant: Harmers Workplace Lawyers
Counsel for the First Respondent: E Raper SC with A Smorchevsky
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Ashurst Australia
Counsel for the Second and Third Respondents: R Davern
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate