Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Rayner v Riley [2020] FCA 587 File number: VID 152 of 2018
Judge: SNADEN J
Date of judgment: 6 May 2020
Catchwords: INDUSTRIAL LAW – application under s 164 of the Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Act 2009 (Cth) for an order directing the performance or observance of union rules – interpretation of union rules – whether funds owing to a former employee of a union should be paid from funds under the control of the branch within which she was employed or the division within which that branch was founded – whether resolutions directing transfer of money from funds controlled by the branch to funds controlled by the division were valid under the union's rules – whether the court should decline to grant relief on discretionary grounds – application dismissed UNION RULES – validity of resolution – whether reasonable notice was given of a meeting at which a resolution was passed – whether resolution was made beyond power – separate resolution to ratify, authorise and/or endorse a prior resolution – validity of latter resolution – whether ratification could operate retroactively – whether latter resolution was invalid insofar as it purported to ratify, authorise or endorse an earlier resolution after the time for compliance therewith had expired – whether latter resolution was made beyond power – whether latter resolution was made in accordance with union rules – whether demand for payment made in consequence of latter resolution was a demand that the resolution authorised – whether the maker of the demand considered that it was reasonable in the circumstances
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate