Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Frigger v Kitay (No 3) [2020] FCA 650 File number: WAD 492 of 2018
Judge: CHARLESWORTH J
Date of judgment: 14 May 2020
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – costs – whether costs should follow the event on multiple interlocutory applications - – whether costs should be awarded in a lump sum – whether costs should be payable within 14 days
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 477, 477B, 556 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 37M Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 40.02, 40.03
Cases cited: Avetmiss Easy Pty Ltd v Australian Skills Qualifications Authority (No 2) (2014) 315 ALR 131 Beach Petroleum NL v Johnson (No 2) (1995) 57 FCR 119 Frigger v Kitay (No 2) [2020] FCA 497 Keen v Telstra Corporation Limited (No 2) [2006] FCA 930 Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72 Salfinger v Niugini Mining (Aust) Pty Ltd (No 5) [2008] FCA 1119 Seven Network Ltd v News Ltd [2007] FCA 2059 Vantage Holdings Pty Ltd v Huang (No 2) (2015) 232 FCR 556
Date of hearing: Determined on the papers
Date of last submissions: 24 April 2020 (Respondents) 4 May 2020 (Applicants)
Registry: Western Australia
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: General and Personal Insolvency
Category: Catchwords
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate