Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
AGK17 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 668 Appeal from: AGK17 v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2019] FCCA 1156
File number: NSD 797 of 2019
Judge: ANDERSON J
Date of judgment: 21 May 2020
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appellant applied for temporary protection visa – appellant claimed that he feared harm if returned to Pakistan because he was caught having pre-marital sex – appellant claimed that he would be subject to punishment pursuant to a decision of a local Jirga council – delegate's decision not to grant visa referred to Immigration Assessment Authority (Authority) – appellant provided copy of purported Jirga decision, with English translation (Jirga Translation), to the Authority – Jirga Translation was "new information" – Authority determined under 473DD of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) that there were not exceptional circumstances to justify considering the Jirga Translation – whether Authority committed a jurisdictional error by failing to consider the credibility and potential importance of the Jirga Translation Held: appeal dismissed – no jurisdictional error – Authority did not fail to ask itself the correct question or apply the correct test – Authority did not fail to consider the credibility and potential importance of Jirga Translation
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) Pt 7AA, ss 473CA, 473DB(1), 473DC(2), 473DD, 473DD(a), 473DD(b), 473DD(b)(i), 473DD(b)(ii), 473FA
Cases cited: ABH18 v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCA 620 AGK17 v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2019] FCCA 1156 AQU17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 111; 162 ALD 442 AUS17 v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2017] FCCA 1986 AUS17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection & Anor [2020] HCATrans 55 BLR17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCA 2167 BVD17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] HCA 34; 93 ALJR 1091; 373 ALR 196 BVZ16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 958; 254 FCR 221 CCR18 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 9 CHF16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCAFC 192; 162 ALD 1 CVS16 v Minister For Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 951 CVV16 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 1890 DGZ16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 12; 258 FCR 551 DLB17 v Minister for Home Affairs [2018] FCAFC 230 Maan v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2009] FCAFC 150; 179 FCR 581 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v AUS17 [2019] FCA 1686 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v BBS16 [2017] FCAFC 176; 257 FCR 111 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v CQW17 [2018] FCAFC 110; 264 FCR 249 Plaintiff M174/2016 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] HCA 16; 264 CLR 217 R v Kelly [2000] 1 QB 198 Taulahi v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCAFC 177; 246 FCR 146
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate