Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
PT Garuda Indonesia Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2020] FCA 685 Appeal from: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v PT Garuda Indonesia Ltd (Remedies) [2019] FCA 786
File number: NSD 1011 of 2019
Judge: YATES J
Date of judgment: 21 May 2020
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for stay of appeal until further order – in circumstances where appellant has failed to comply with an order of the Court to pay pecuniary penalties – the power of the Court to control its own proceedings – power to grant a stay of proceedings – whether contempt demonstrated
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 124, 129, 601CD Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 25(2B)(ab), 28, 31 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 42.12 Foreign States Immunities Act 1985 (Cth) s 3(1)
Cases cited: Alexander v Cambridge Credit Corporation Limited (Receivers Appointed) (1985) 2 NSWLR 685 Australasian Meat Industry Employees' Union v Mudginberri Station Pty Ltd (1986) 161 CLR 98 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v PT Garuda Indonesia Ltd (Remedies) [2019] FCA 786; 370 ALR 637 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited [2019] FCA 964; 138 ACSR 42 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v World Netsafe Pty Ltd (No 3) [2003] FCA 159; 127 FCR 542 Bond Corporation Pty Limited v Thiess Contractors Pty Limited (1986) 14 FCR 193 Foster v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2014] FCA 240; 219 FCR 563 Hadkinson v Hadkinson [1952] P 285 Hughes Motor Service Pty Ltd v Wang Computer Pty Ltd (1978) 35 FLR 346 Hwang v Lawrie [2013] QCA 204; [2014] 1 Qd R 562 Jorgensen v Fair Work Ombudsman [2019] FCAFC 113; 371 ALR 426 Kazal v Thunder Studios Inc (California) [2017] FCAFC 111; 256 FCR 90 KP Cable Investments Pty Ltd v Meltglow Pty Ltd (1995) 56 FCR 189 Louis Vuitton Malletier SA v Design Elegance Pty Ltd [2006] FCA 83; 149 FCR 494 Metcash Trading Ltd v Bunn (No 5) [2009] FCA 16 Muller v Fencott (1981) 53 FLR 184 Powerflex Services Pty Ltd v Data Access Corp (1996) 67 FCR 65 PT Garuda Indonesia Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2011] FCAFC 52; 192 FCR 393 PT Garuda Indonesia Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (Penalty Stay Application) [2019] FCA 1317 Siminton v Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (No 3) [2008] FCAFC 89; 168 FCR 140 Stokes (by a tutor) v McCourt [2013] NSWSC 1014 Trade Practices Commission v Manfal Pty Limited (1990) 27 FCR 284 Young v Jackman (1986) 7 NSWLR 97
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate