Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Gill v Ethicon Sárl (No 8) [2020] FCA 771 File number: NSD 1590 of 2012
Judge: KATZMANN J
Date of judgment: 5 June 2020
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE — application to vary injunction and for stay of injunction in the alternative
Legislation: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), s 235 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 39.05(d)
Cases cited: Alexander v Cambridge Credit Corporation Ltd (receivers appointed) (1985) 2 NSWLR 685 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v True Alliance Trading Pty Ltd (formerly, Reebok Australia Pty Ltd) (No 2) [2017] FCA 990 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v ActiveSuper Pty Ltd (No 4) [2013] FCA 318 Bryant v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (1996) 70 ALJR 306; 90 LGERA 126; 134 ALR 460 ICI Australia Operations Pty Ltd v Trade Practices Commission (1992) 38 FCR 248 New South Wales Bar Association v Stevens [2003] NSWCA 95; 52 ATR 602 Phillip Morris (Australia) Pty Ltd v Nixon [1999] FCA 1281 Powerflex Services Pty Ltd v Data Access Corporation (1996) 67 FCR 65 Red Bull Australia Pty Ltd v Sydneywide Distributors Pty Limited t/as Sydneywide Bottlers Australia [2001] FCA 1750
Date of hearing: 25 May 2020
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Regulator and Consumer Protection
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate