Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZQYM v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 779 Appeal from: SZQYM & Anor v Minister for Home Affairs & Anor [2019] FCCA 490 SZQYN v Minister for Home Affairs & Anor [2019] FCCA 489
File numbers: NSD 496 of 2019 NSD 516 of 2019
Judge: ALLSOP CJ
Date of judgment: 12 June 2020
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal from the Federal Circuit Court of Australia – judicial review of decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal affirming refusal to grant a protection visa – whether Tribunal committed jurisdictional error – apprehended bias – whether Tribunal relied on fundamental error of fact – whether Tribunal failed to identify and assess a 'receiving country' under s 36(2)(aa) – appeal allowed
Legislation: Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) ss 78, 136 Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 36(2)(a), 36(2)(aa), 424, 424A
Cases cited: ALA15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCAFC 30 ARG15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCAFC 174; 250 FCR 109 Barakat v Goritsas (No 2) [2012] NSWCA 36 Branir Pty Ltd v Owston Nominees (No 2) Pty Ltd [2001] FCA 1833; 117 FCR 424 British American Tobacco Australia Services Ltd v Laurie [2011] HCA 2; 242 CLR 283 CNY17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] HCA 50; 375 ALR 47 Coulton v Holcombe [1986] HCA 33; 162 CLR 1 CQG15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCAFC 146; 253 FCR 496 Devaney v The Queen [2012] NSWCCA 285 Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy [2000] HCA 63; 205 CLR 337 EVS17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCAFC 20; 268 FCR 299 Gill v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCAFC 51; 250 FCR 309 Han v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 331 Hossain v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] HCA 34; 264 CLR 123 Lithgow City Council v Jackson [2011] HCA 36; 244 CLR 352 Michael Wilson & Partners v Nicholls [2011] HCA 48; 244 CLR 427 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZMTA [2019] HCA 3; 264 CLR 421 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Khadgi [2010] FCAFC 145; 190 FCR 248 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Jia Legeng [2001] HCA 17; 205 CLR 507 NADH of 2001 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 328; 214 ALR 264 Plaintiff M47/2018 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] HCA 17; 265 CLR 285 Re JRL; Ex parte CJL [1986] HCA 39; 161 CLR 342 Singh v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 389; 109 FCR 152 SZQYM v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2014] FCA 427; 220 FCR 505 SZRUI v Minister for Immigration, Multicultural Affairs and Citizenship [2013] FCAFC 80 Tickner v Chapman [1995] FCA 987; 57 FCR 451 Webb v The Queen [1994] HCA 30; 181 CLR 41
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate