Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Gandel Metals Pty Ltd, in the matter of Centennial Mining Limited (Subject to Deed of Company Arrangement) v Centennial Mining Limited (No 3) [2020] FCA 794 File number: VID 688 of 2019
Judge: MIDDLETON J
Date of judgment: 5 June 2020
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – costs – costs follow the event – relief to be confined to that claimed in originating application
Date of hearing: 12 March 2020
Date of last submissions: 3 June 2020
Registry: Melbourne
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Corporations and Corporate Insolvency
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 13
Counsel for the Plaintiff: Mr S Maiden QC with Mr A Ounapuu
Solicitor for the Plaintiff: HWL Ebsworth
Counsel for the Defendants: Mr P D Crutchfield QC with Mr P R Edgar
Solicitor for the Defendants: Lavan
Counsel for the Interested Party: Mr H Austin QC and Mr C R Brown
Solicitor for the Interested Party: CCK Lawyers
ORDERS VID 688 of 2019 IN THE MATTER OF CENTENNIAL MINING LIMITED (SUBJECT TO DEED OF COMPANY ARRANGEMENT) (ACN 149 308 921) BETWEEN: GANDEL METALS PTY LTD (ACN 102 347 955) Plaintiff
AND: CENTENNIAL MINING LIMITED (SUBJECT TO DEED OF COMPANY ARRANGEMENT) (ACN 149 308 921) First Defendant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate