Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
EGY18 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 796 Appeal from: EGY18 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCCA 1874
File number(s): NSD 1539 of 2019
Judge(s): PERRY J
Date of judgment: 9 June 2020
Catchwords: MIGRATION – where Immigration Assessment Authority (IAA) affirmed decision not to grant the appellant a safe haven visa – appeal from Federal Circuit Court dismissing application for judicial review of IAA decision – whether IAA failed to consider country information so as to fall into jurisdictional error – principles governing drawing of inferences in context of reasons prepared in accordance with s 473EA, Migration Act – whether IAA required to consider the appellant's risk profile against UNHCR Guidelines – whether IAA failed to assess appellant's claims cumulatively – appeal dismissed
Legislation: Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) s 25D Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 5H, 5J, 35A, 36(2), Pt 7AA Immigrants and Emigrants Act 1949 (Sri Lanka)
Cases cited: Abebe v Commonwealth [1999] HCA 14; (1999) 197 CLR 510 BVD17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 114 BYA v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCAFC 44; (2019) 269 FCR 94 CNC15 v Federal Circuit Court of Australia [2018] FCAFC 204 Craig v South Australia [1995] HCA 58; (1995) 184 CLR 163 DMI16 v Federal Circuit Court of Australia [2018] FCAFC 95; (2018) 264 FCR 454 Dranichnikov v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2003] HCA 26; 77 ALJR 1088 Minister for Home Affairs v HSKJ [2018] FCAFC 217; (2018) 266 FCR 591 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v AMA16 [2017] FCAFC 136; (2017) 254 FCR 534 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v DDK16 [2017] FCAFC 188 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li [2013] HCA 18; (2013) 249 CLR 332 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZQRB [2013] FCAFC 33; (2013) 210 FCR 505 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Guo [1997] HCA 22; (1997) 191 CLR 559 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Rajalingam [1999] FCA 719; (1999) 93 FCR 220 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf [2001] HCA 30; (2001) 206 CLR 323 NABE v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (No 2) [2004] FCAFC 263; (2004) 144 FCR 1 NAHI v Minister for Immigration [2004] FCAFC 10 Plaintiff M174/2016 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] HCA 16; (2018) 264 CLR 217 Plaintiff M64/2015 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] HCA 50; (2015) 258 CLR 173 Randhawa v Minister for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs [1994] FCA 535; (1994) 52 FCR 437 Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; ex parte Applicant S20/2002 [2003] HCA 30; (2003) 77 ALJR 1165 SZTMD v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2105] FCA 150; (2015) 150 ALD 34 SZTZY v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 911
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate