Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
ANI15 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 798 Appeal from: ANI15 & Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs & Anor [2019] FCCA 3301
File number: VID 1365 of 2019
Judge: SNADEN J
Date of judgment: 12 June 2020
Catchwords: MIGRATION – protection visa – appeal from a decision of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia – application for review of a decision to refuse a protection visa – whether the Administrative Appeals Tribunal failed to take account of relevant considerations – whether the Tribunal was obliged to consider submissions and evidence advanced in a previously constituted tribunal – whether the Tribunal failed to take into account the appellant's alleged impecuniosity – whether the appellant's liability for payment for his removal from Australia was a relevant consideration – legal unreasonableness – appeal dismissed
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 36 and 210
Cases cited: ANI15 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs & Anor [2019] FCCA 3301 Coal and Allied Operations Pty Ltd v Australian Industrial Relations Commission (2000) 203 CLR 194 DCP16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCAFC 91 Hossain v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2018) 264 CLR 123 Minister for Home Affairs v Buadromo (2018) 267 FCR 320 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Eden (2016) 240 FCR 158 NBMZ v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2014) 220 FCR 1 Republic of Nauru v WET040 (No 2) (2018) 93 ALJR 102 SZGUW v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2009) 108 ALD 108
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate