Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Quantum Housing Group Pty Ltd (No 2) [2020] FCA 802 File number: WAD 229 of 2019
Judge: COLVIN J
Date of judgment: 9 June 2020
Catchwords: CONSUMER LAW - application by regulator for declarations of contraventions, disqualification order, pecuniary penalties and publication orders - where facts and proposed orders agreed by parties - whether company engaged in misleading conduct in contravention of s 18(1) of Australian Consumer Law - whether company made false representations in contravention of s 29(1)(l) and s 29(1)(m) of ACL - whether company engaged in unconscionable conduct in contravention of s 21 of ACL - consideration of standard of conscience fixed by statutory notion of unconscionable conduct - where no indication that company's conduct exploited vulnerability of investors - consideration of quantum of appropriate penalty for company - whether agreed quantum of penalty for sole director and secretary of company within permissible range - proposed orders made save as to orders declaring unconscionable conduct
Legislation: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) s 137H, Schedule 2 (Australian Consumer Law) ss 18, 21, 22, 29, 224
Cases cited: Ainsworth v Criminal Justice Commission [1992] HCA 10; (1992) 175 CLR 564 Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2017] FCAFC 113; (2017) 254 FCR 68 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 330 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Geowash Pty Ltd (Subject to a Deed of Company Arrangement) (No 4) [2020] FCA 23 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v MSY Technology Pty Ltd (No 2) [2011] FCA 382 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v TPG Internet Pty Ltd [2013] HCA 54; (2013) 250 CLR 640 Australian Securities & Investments Commission v Westpac Banking Corporation [2018] FCA 1733 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Kobelt [2019] HCA 18 Commonwealth of Australia v Director, Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate [2015] HCA 46; (2015) 258 CLR 482 Commonwealth of Australia v Director, Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate [2015] HCA 46; (2015) 258 CLR 482 Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Cahill [2010] FCAFC 39 Director of Consumer Affairs Victoria v Alpha Flight Services Pty Ltd [2015] FCAFC 118 Minister for Industry, Tourism and Resources v Mobil Oil Australia Pty Ltd [2004] FCAFC 72 NW Frozen Foods Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [1996] FCA 1134; (1996) 71 FCR 285 Paciocco v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [2015] FCAFC 50; (2015) 236 FCR 199 Singtel Optus Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2012] FCAFC 20 Trade Practices Commission v CSR Ltd [1990] FCA 762
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate