Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Williams v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 814 File numbers: VID 424 of 2017
Judge: WHEELAHAN J
Date of judgment: 12 June 2020
Catchwords: MIGRATION – judicial review of a decision not to revoke an earlier visa cancellation decision pursuant to s 501CA(4) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – whether the applicant was afforded procedural fairness – whether there was error because the Assistant Minister decision-maker did not consider the most up to date information – application dismissed.
Legislation: Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) ss 19(1) Item 1 and 20 Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 476A, 501(2), 501(3A), 501(7) and 501CA Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 30.25 Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) reg 2.52(2)(b)
Cases cited: Allied Pastoral Holdings Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation [1983] 1 NSWLR 1; 44 ALR 607 Bochenski v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCAFC 68; 250 FCR 209 BRF038 v Republic of Nauru [2017] HCA 44; 91 ALJR 1197 Bulstrode v Trimble [1970] VR 840 Commissioner for Australian Capital Territory Revenue v Alphaone Pty Ltd [1994] FCA 1074; 49 FCR 576 EFX17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCAFC 230; 374 ALR 272 Ellis v Wallsend District Hospital (1989) 17 NSWLR 553 Huynh v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] HCATrans 968 Kioa v West [1985] HCA 81; 159 CLR 550 Lecornu v R [2012] VSCA 137; 36 VR 382 Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd [1986] HCA 40; 162 CLR 24 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZMTA [2019] HCA 3; 264 CLR 421 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZSSJ [2016] HCA 29; 259 CLR 180 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v Huynh [2004] FCAFC 256; 139 FCR 505 Papaconstuntinos v Holmes a Court [2012] HCA 53; 249 CLR 534 Picard v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 1430 Saeed v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2010] HCA 23; 241 CLR 252 SZBEL v Minister for Immigration [2006] HCA 63; 228 CLR 152 Tickner v Bropho [1993] FCA 208; 40 FCR 183 Viane v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 116; 263 FCR 531
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate