Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
AJH19 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 821 Appeal from: AJH19 v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2019] FCCA 2599
File number(s): NSD 1807 of 2019
Judge(s): THAWLEY J
Date of judgment: 11 June 2020
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 473DD
Cases cited: AJH19 v Minister For Immigration & Anor [2019] FCCA 2599 Applicant WAEE v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2003) 236 FCR 593
Date of hearing: 11 June 2020
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 28
Counsel for the Appellant: The appellant appeared in person
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr Johnson
Solicitor for the Respondents: HWL Ebsworth Lawyers
ORDERS NSD 1807 of 2019
BETWEEN: AJH19 Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION, CITIZENSHIP, MIGRANT SERVICES AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS First Respondent
IMMIGRATION ASSESSMENT AUTHORITY Second Respondent
JUDGE: THAWLEY J DATE OF ORDER: 11 June 2020
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The appeal be dismissed. 2. The appellant pay the respondents costs. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
(revised from transcript)
THAWLEY J:
Introduction 1 This is an appeal from orders of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia made on 18 October 2019, dismissing an application for judicial review of a decision of the Immigration Assessment Authority made on 15 January 2019: AJH19 v Minister For Immigration & Anor [2019] FCCA 2599 (AJH19 (No1)). 2 The Authority had affirmed a decision of a delegate of the first respondent (Minister) refusing to grant the appellant a Safe Haven Enterprise (subclass 790) visa (SHEV). 3 The Federal Circuit Court dismissed the two grounds of review advanced, holding that the Authority had not failed to consider: (a) the appellant's claim in the ways asserted; or (b) "new information" provided to the Authority by the appellant. For the reasons which follow, the Federal Circuit Court has not been shown to have erred.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate