Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Tresize v National Australia Bank Limited [2020] FCA 902 File numbers: VG 200 of 1992 VID 1382 of 2018
Judge: MOSHINSKY J
Date of judgment: 26 June 2020
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for summary dismissal – where the applicant claimed that consent orders made in 1993 should be set aside on the basis of fraud on the part of the respondent – where the applicant had brought at least three earlier proceedings seeking to have the consent orders set aside – whether the claims should be permanently stayed or dismissed on the basis of abuse of process, Anshun estoppel, res judicata or issue estoppel – whether the claims should be dismissed on the ground that they had no reasonable prospect of success or constituted an abuse of process
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), s 31A National Consumer Credit Protection Act 2009 (Cth) Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 2011, rr 26.01, 39.05 Crimes Act 1958 (Vic) Transfer of Land Act 1958 (Vic)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate