Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Animals Australia Federation v Secretary, Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment [2020] FCA 905 File number: VID 392 of 2020
Judge: KENNY J
Date of judgment: 16 June 2020
Date of publication of reasons: 26 June 2020
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – application for judicial review of decision to grant an exemption under s 12(1) of the Australian Meat and Live-Stock Industry (Prohibition of Export of Sheep by Sea to Middle East – Northern Summer) Order 2020 to permit the export of sheep in the Northern Hemisphere summer – standing of the applicant – whether the applicant had a sufficient interest to be entitled to procedural fairness – where applicant established with the purpose of preventing or relieving the suffering of animals – applicant's purpose, policy and expertise regarding animal welfare and sheep exports insufficient – course of dealings with the Department did not create an obligation to afford procedural fairness – whether failure to invite the applicant to update information provided by it unreasonable – application dismissed
Legislation: Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) ss 3, 5(1), 16(1) Australian Meat and Live-stock Industry Act 1997 (Cth) s 17 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B(1A) Australian Meat and Live-Stock Industry (Prohibition of Export of Sheep by Sea to Middle East – Northern Summer) Order 2020 (Cth) ss 8, 11, 12, 13
Cases cited: Annetts v McCann [1990] HCA 57; 170 CLR 596 Botany Bay City Council v Minister of State for Transport and Regional Development (1996) 66 FCR 537 Degning v Minister for Home Affairs [2018] FCA 1152 Degning v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCAFC 67; 270 FCR 451 FAI Insurance v Winneke [1982] HCA 26; 151 CLR 342 Ferguson v Cole [2002] FCA 1411; 121 FCR 402 Geelong Community for Good Life Inc v Environment Protection Authority [2008] VSC 185; 20 VR 338 Griffith University v Tang [2005] HCA 7; 221 CLR 99 Kioa v West (1985) 159 CLR 550 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v WZARH [2015] HCA 40; 256 CLR 326 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Le [2007] FCA 1318; 164 FCR 151 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li [2013] HCA 18; 249 CLR 332 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZIAI [2009] HCA 39; 259 ALR 429 Onus v Alcoa of Australia Ltd (1981) 149 CLR 27 Plaintiff S10/2011 v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] HCA 31; 246 CLR 636 Queensland Medical Laboratory v Blewett (1988) 84 ALR 615 Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs; ex parte Lam [2003] HCA 6; 214 CLR 1 Rivers SOS Inc v Minister for Planning [2009] NSWLEC 213; 178 LGERA 347 Wilderness Society Inc v Turnbull [2007] FCAFC 175; 166 FCR 154
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate