Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Tetley v Goldmate Group Pty Ltd [2020] FCA 913 File number(s): NSD 667 of 2019
Judge(s): BROMWICH J
Date of judgment: 17 June 2020
Date of publication of reasons: 29 June 2020
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application to adjourn – where Court will be required to decide between two competing accounts on at least one of the issues at trial – where a remote hearing will impede the ability to obtain instructions in a timely manner – application granted.
Cases cited: Capic v Ford Motor Company [2020] FCA 486 Haiye Developments v The CBC [2020] NSWSC 732 JKC Australia LNG v CH2M Hill Companies Limited [2020] WASCA 38 Quirk v Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (Remote Video Conferencing) [2020] FCA 664
Date of hearing: 17 June 2020
Registry: New South Wales
Division: Fair Work Division
National Practice Area: Employment & Industrial Relations
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 21
Counsel for the Applicant: Ms L Saunders
Solicitor for the Applicant: Danny King Legal
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr B Rauf
Solicitor for the Respondents: People + Culture Strategies
ORDERS NSD 667 of 2019
BETWEEN: ALEXANDER JAMES TETLEY Applicant
AND: GOLDMATE GROUP PTY LTD First Respondent
YUCHEN YANG Second Respondent
BUYANG NI Third Respondent
JUDGE: BROMWICH J DATE OF ORDER: 17 JUNE 2020
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The oral application to adjourn the trial listed for 22, 23 and 24 June 2020 be granted. 2. The matter be listed for trial on either 7–9 September 2020 or 28–30 October 2020, depending on the outcome of an application in another proceeding. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate