Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZSLA v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 944 Appeal from: SZSLA v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2019] FCCA 2824
File number: NSD 2154 of 2019
Judge: COLVIN J
Date of judgment: 7 July 2020
Catchwords: MIGRATION - appeal from decision of Federal Circuit Court dismissing application for judicial review of decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal - where Tribunal affirmed delegate's decision to refuse appellants' application for partner visa - whether primary judge erred in failing to find Tribunal did not engage in active intellectual process when considering fundamental part of claim - where first appellant claimed he was father to four children in Australia - consideration of jurisdictional error on basis of failure to engage in active intellectual process in forming required state of satisfaction - appeal allowed
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 65 Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) Schedule 2 cl 820.211, Schedule 3 criterion 3001
Cases cited: Ali v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 1900 Attorney-General (NSW) v Quin [1990] HCA 21; (1990) 170 CLR 1 AXT19 v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCAFC 32 Ayoub v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCAFC 83; (2015) 231 FCR 513 BCR16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCAFC 96; (2017) 248 FCR 456 Bondelmonte v Bondelmonte [2017] HCA 8; (2017) 259 CLR 662 Carrascalao v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCAFC 107; (2017) 252 FCR 352 EHF17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCA 1681 Hands v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 225; (2018) 267 FCR 628 Hossain v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] HCA 34; (2018) 264 CLR 123 Khan v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs [1987] FCA 713 Minister for Home Affairs v Omar [2019] FCAFC 188 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Singh [2014] FCAFC 1; (2014) 231 FCR 437 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZMTA [2019] HCA 3; (2019) 264 CLR 421 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZVFW [2018] HCA 30; (2018) 264 CLR 541 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v WZARH [2015] HCA 40; (2015) 256 CLR 326 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZJSS [2010] HCA 48; (2010) 243 CLR 164 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZMDS [2010] HCA 16; (2010) 240 CLR 611 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf [2001] HCA 30; (2001) 206 CLR 323 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v SGLB [2004] HCA 32 Navoto v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCAFC 135 Nobarani v Mariconte [2018] HCA 36; (2018) 265 CLR 236 Singh v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCAFC 3; (2019) 267 FCR 200 Singh v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCAFC 7 Stead v State Government Insurance Commission [1986] HCA 54; (1986) 161 CLR 141 SZQPY v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 359 Tsvetnenko v United States of America [2019] FCAFC 74; (2019) 269 FCR 225
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate