Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Hill v Zhang (No 3) [2020] FCA 969 File number: ACD 50 of 2019
Judge: GRIFFITHS J
Date of judgment: 9 July 2020
Catchwords: COSTS – interlocutory application for release of funds from existing security for costs – whether an order should be made that the applicants are jointly and severally liable to give additional security – release of funds and additional security ordered
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 1335 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), ss 23, 56 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), rr 1.32, 19.01
Cases cited: Austcorp Project Number 20 Pty Ltd v L M Investment Management Ltd (in liq) [2014] FCA 1371 Australian Battery Distributors Pty Ltd v Robert Bosch (Australia) Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 1164 Bell Wholesale Co Ltd v Gates Export Corporation [1984] FCA 29; 2 FCR 1 Capital Webworks Pty Ltd v Adultshop.com.Limited [2008] FCA 40 Co-Operative Farmers' & Graziers' & Direct Meat Supply Ltd v Smart [1977] VR 386 Cowell v Taylor (1885) 31 ChD 34 Coyle v Cassimatis [1994] 2 QdR 262 East Grace Corporation v Xing (No 1) [2005] FCA 219 Fiduciary Ltd v Morningstar Research [2004] NSWSC 664; 208 ALR 564 Hill v The Council of the Law Society of the ACT (No 2) [2020] ACTCA 13 Hill v Zhang [2019] FCA 1562 Hill v Zhang (No 2) [2019] FCA 1649 P S Chellaram v China Ocean Shipping Co [1991] HCA 36; 102 CLR 321 Truth About Motorways Pty Ltd v Macquarie Infrastructure Investment Management Ltd [2001] FCA 1603
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate