Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Bornecrantz v Secretary, Department of Social Services [2020] FCA 981 Appeal from: Application for extension of time for leave to appeal: Bornecrantz v Secretary, Department of Social Services [2019] FCA 1733
File number: NSD 1932 of 2019
Judge: KATZMANN J
Date of judgment: 13 July 2020
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE — application for extension of time to seek leave to appeal from interlocutory judgment — where primary judge made orders summarily dismissing appeal from Administrative Appeals Tribunal under s 31A(2) of Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) — where Tribunal had dismissed application for review on two independent bases and no challenge was made in the proceeding below to the first basis and where primary judge held there were no reasonable prospects of successfully challenging the second basis — where insignificant delay, no prejudice and explanation for delay, whether time should be extended — whether proposed appeal reasonably arguable
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) s 44 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 24(1A) and (1D)(b), 31A(2), 37M Social Security Act 1991 (Cth) ss 7(3), 43 Social Security (Administration Act) 1999 (Cth) s 29 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 26.01(1), 35.13, 36.01(2)(c)
Cases cited: Andelman v Secretary, Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs (2011) 213 FCR 345 Branir Pty Ltd v Owston Nominees (No. 2) Pty Ltd (2001) 117 FCR 424 Charara v Commissioner of Taxation [2016] FCA 451; 103 ATR 118 Décor Corporation Pty Limited v Dart Industries Inc (1991) 33 FCR 397 Jefferson Ford Pty Ltd v Ford Motor Company of Australia Ltd (2008) 167 FCR 372 Riva NSW Pty Limited v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy [2017] FCA 188 SZTRY v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCAFC 86
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate