Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Friday v Minister for Primary Industry and Resources [2020] FCA 984 File number: NTD 40 of 2019
Judge: SC DERRINGTON J
Date of judgment: 14 July 2020
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for production of documents – legal advice privilege – whether communications made for the dominant purpose of legal advice – where confidential bundle of sample documents provided to Court for examination
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) Mineral Titles Act 2011 (NT) Evidence Act 1995 (Cth)
Cases cited: Aquila Coal Pty Ltd v Bowen Central Coal Pty Ltd [2013] QSC 082 Archer Capital 4A Pty Ltd (as trustee for the Archer Capital Trust 4A) v Sage Group plc (No 2) [2013] FCA 1098, (2013) 306 ALR 384 Archer Capital 4A Pty Ltd v Sage Group Plc (No 2) (2013) 306 ALR 384 Asahi Holdings (Australia) Pty Ltd v Pacific Equity Partners Pty Limited (No 4) [2014] FCA 796 AWB Ltd v Cole (2006) 152 FCR 382 AWB Ltd v Cole (No 5) (2006) 155 FCR 30 Balabel v Air India [1988] Ch 317 Commissioner of Australian Federal Police v Propend Finance Pty Ltd (1997) 188 CLR 501 Commissioner of Taxation v Pratt Holdings Pty Ltd (2005) 225 ALR 266 Commissioner of Taxation v Rio Tinto Ltd (2006) 151 FCR 341 Daniels Corporation International Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2002) 213 CLR 543 DSE (Holdings) Pty Ltd v InterTAN Inc (2003) 127 FCR 499 DSE (Holdings) Pty Ltd v InterTAN Inc (2003) 135 FCR 151 Dye v Commonwealth Securities Ltd (No 5) [2010] FCA 950 Esso Australia Resources Limited v Commissioner of Taxation (1999) 201 CLR 49 Grant v Downs (1976) 135 CLR 674 Hancock v Rinehart (Privilege) [2016] NSWSC 12 Kenquist Nominees Pty Ltd v Campbell (No 5) [2018] FCA 853 Mann v Carnell (1999) 201 CLR 1 Martin v Norton Rose Fulbright Australia (No 2) [2019] FCA 96 Martin v Norton Rose Fulbright Australia (No 2) [2019] FCA 1101 Rich v Harrington [2007] FCA 1987, (2007) 245 ALR 106 Rinehart v Rinehart [2016] NSWCA 58 Seven Network Ltd v News Ltd [2005] FCA 142 Telstra Corporation Ltd v Minister for Communications, Information Technology and the Arts (No 2) [2007] FCA 1445 Waterford v The Commonwealth of Australia (1987) 163 CLR 54
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate