Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Tresize v National Australia Bank Limited (No 2) [2020] FCA 997 File numbers: VG 200 of 1992 VID 1382 of 2018
Judge: MOSHINSKY J
Date of judgment: 15 July 2020
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – costs – costs of application seeking summary dismissal of proceeding – where application successful
Date of hearing: Determined on the papers
Date of last submissions: 10 July 2020
Registry: Victoria
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Corporations and Corporate Insolvency
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 6
Counsel for the First Applicant in VG 200/1992 Mr Tresize appeared in person and Counsel for the Applicant in VID 1382/2018:
Counsel for the Respondent in each Proceeding: Mr DC Morgan
Solicitor for the Respondent in each Proceeding: King & Wood Mallesons
ORDERS VG 200 of 1992
BETWEEN: JOHN COLIN MAXWELL TRESIZE First Applicant
MONICA ANN TRESIZE Second Applicant
REMEA PTY LTD (ACN 006 356 047) (and others named in the Schedule) Third Applicant
AND: NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LIMITED (ACN 004 044 937) Respondent
JUDGE: MOSHINSKY J DATE OF ORDER: 15 JULY 2020
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The first applicant pay the respondent's costs of and incidental to the first applicant's interlocutory application filed on 5 July 2018, as agreed or assessed. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate