Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Commonwealth of Australia v Sanofi (formerly Sanofi-Aventis) (No 6) [2020] FCA 1001 File number: NSD 1639 of 2007
Judge: NICHOLAS J
Date of judgment: 16 July 2020
Catchwords: COSTS – whether costs to be awarded to respondents should be reduced on account of applicant's success on discrete issues – respondents awarded 85% of their costs of the proceeding
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 657A Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 43
Cases cited: Anchorage Capital Partners Pty Limited v ACPA Pty Ltd (No 2) [2018] FCAFC 112 Bowen Investments Pty Ltd v Tabcorp Holdings Ltd (No 2) [2008] FCAFC 107 Commonwealth of Australia v Sanofi (formerly Sanofi-Aventis) (No 5) [2020] FCA 543 EMI Songs Australia Pty Limited v Larrikin Music Publishing Pty Ltd [2011] FCAFC 92 Hockey v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Limited (No 2) (2015) 237 FCR 127 Idenix Pharmaceuticals LLC v Gilead Sciences Pty Ltd (No 2) [2018] FCAFC 7 James v Surf Road Nominees Pty Ltd (No 2) [2005] NSWCA 296 Queensland North Australia Pty Ltd v Takeovers Panel (2015) 230 FCR 150 Queensland North Australia Pty Ltd and Others v Takeovers Panel and Others (No 2) (2015) 236 FCR 370 Roadshow Films Pty Ltd v iiNet Ltd (No 2) (2011) 91 IPR 482 Ruddock v Vadarlis (No 2) (2001) 115 FCR 229
Date of hearing: Determined on the papers
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate