Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs v BTW17 [2020] FCA 1008 Appeal from: BTW17 v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2019] FCCA 3614
File number: WAD 20 of 2020
Judge: BESANKO J
Date of judgment: 16 July 2020
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE — application for a stay of a costs order pending the hearing and determination of an appeal to the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia — whether the grounds of appeal are reasonably arguable — whether there is no reasonable probability of recovering the costs paid to the first respondent in the event that a stay is not granted and the appeal is successful — whether the appellant has engaged in any disentitling conduct
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 473DD
Cases cited: Adeels Palace Pty Ltd v Moubarak [2009] NSWCA 130 Alexander v Cambridge Credit Corporation Ltd (Receivers Appointed) (1985) 2 NSWLR 685 Andrews v John Fairfax and Sons Limited [1979] 2 NSWLR 185 Bridges v Australian Consolidated Press Limited (unreported, New South Wales Court of Appeal, Sugerman P, 16 June 1970) BTW17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 10; (2018) 258 FCR 511 CSR16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 474 Illawong Village Pty Limited v State Bank of New South Wales [2005] NSWSC 524 Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs v BFW20 by his Litigation Representative BFW20A [2020] FCA 615
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate