Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Hanwood Pastoral Co Pty Limited v Kelly [2020] FCA 1020 File number(s): NSD 1053 of 2019
Judge(s): RARES J
Date of judgment: 7 July 2020
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for default judgment under r 5.23 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 – application for adjournment not supported by evidence – where first defendant did not appear and had not filed a defence – application for adjournment refused – partial judgment entered
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 2011 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth)
Cases cited: Ahmad v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 199 Catchwords CLU16 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 147 Dinomyte Pty Limited v Australian Security & Investments Commission, in the matter of Hanwood Pastoral Co Pty Limited [2019] FCA 1989 Gulati v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 225 Searson v Salmon [2014] FCA 748 Speedo Holdings BV v Evans (No 2) [2011] FCA 1227 Thunder Studios Inc (California) v Kazal (No 5) [2017] FCA 1572 Thunder Studios Inc (California) v Kazal (No 9) [2020] FCA 846 Yeo v Damos Earthmoving Pty Ltd, in the matter of Beachwood Developments Pty Ltd (in liq) [2011] FCA 1129
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate