Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Chandrasekaran v Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists (No 2) [2020] FCA 1028 File number: NSD 1535 of 2018
Judge: FLICK J
Date of judgment: 22 July 2020
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – order for payment of costs – self-executing order in the event of non-compliance – application to vary orders previously made – claimed impecuniosity – interlocutory application dismissed PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for disqualification because of reasonable apprehension of bias – application rejected
Legislation: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) Sch 2 (Australian Consumer Law s 18) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) ss 16.01, 16.02, 39.05
Cases cited: Brimaud v Honeysett Instant Print Pty Ltd (1988) 217 ALR 44 Chandrasekaran v Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists [2020] FCA 214 Chandrasekaran v Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists [2019] FCA 1687 Clenae Pty Ltd v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [1999] VSCA 35, (1999) 2 VR 573 International Finance Trust Co Ltd v New South Wales Crime Commission [2009] HCA 49, (2009) 240 CLR 319 Maiocchi v Royal Australian & New Zealand College of Psychiatrists (No 4) [2016] FCA 33 Patel v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (No 4) [2012] FCA 1170, (2012) 208 FCR 128 Rana v Commonwealth of Australia [2013] FCA 189 Re JRL, Ex parte CJL (1986) 161 CLR 342
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate