Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Dlaw Pty Ltd v Rusca Bros Services Pty Ltd [2020] FCA 1038 Appeal from: Rusca Bros Services Pty Ltd v DLaw Pty Ltd, in the matter of Rusca Bros Services Pty Ltd [2019] FCA 1865
File number: NSD 2063 of 2019
Judge: GLEESON J
Date of judgment: 21 July 2020
Date of publication of reasons: 27 July 2020
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – where appellant seeking to file notice of discontinuance with no order as to costs – where Federal Court Rules 2011 r 36.37(4) provides that an appellant who files a notice of discontinuance under r 36.37(1) must, unless the parties otherwise agree, pay the costs of each respondent – principle that costs should follow the event – where court did not dispense compliance with r 36.73(4)
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 rr 1.33, 1.34, 36.05, 36.73(1). 36.73(4)
Date of hearing: 21 July 2020
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Corporations and Corporate Insolvency
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 21
Solicitor for the Appellant/Applicant: J Doyle of Doyles Construction Lawyers
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr A Vincent
Solicitor for the Respondent: Gillis Delaney Lawyers
ORDERS NSD 2063 of 2019
BETWEEN: DLAW PTY LTD (ACN 052 127 349) Appellant
AND: RUSCA BROS SERVICES PTY LTD (ACN 154 554 551) Respondent
JUDGE: GLEESON J DATE OF ORDER: 21 July 2020
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate