Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Hundy as Trustee for the Bankrupt Estate of Ryan v Southorn, in the matter of Ryan [2020] FCA 1050 File number: ACD 68 of 2019
Judge: GRIFFITHS J
Date of judgment: 27 July 2020
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – interlocutory application for the respondent's solicitor to be released from an undertaking in order to pay the respondent's reasonable legal costs for defending the substantive proceeding and making a potential application in the Family Court of Australia – whether the Court has the jurisdiction to make the order sought – whether it is appropriate for the Court to make such an order under s 30 of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) – specified amount of funds held pursuant to the undertaking released for the sole purpose of financing the respondent's estimated legal costs of defending the substantive proceeding in this Court
Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) ss 30, 81, 120, 121 Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-Vesting) Act (1993) (ACT) s 4(1) Legal Profession Act 2006 (ACT) s 580
Cases cited: Halsted (Bankrupt) v The Official Trustee in Bankruptcy, in the matter of Halsted (Bankrupt) [2011] FCA 1242 Hycenko v Hrycenko [2016] VSC 247; 50 VR 726 Jackson v Sterling Industries Ltd [1987] HCA 23; 162 CLR 612 Re Bilen; Ex parte Sistrom [1985] FCA 141 Skalkos v Nichols [2009] FCA 346; 175 FCR 547 Talacko v Talacko [2010] FCAFC 54; 183 FCR 311 Tyler v Thomas [2006] FCAFC 6; 150 FCR 357 Vale v Sutherland [2009] HCA 26; 237 CLR 638
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate