Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Hardingham v RP Data Pty Limited [2020] FCA 1062 File number: NSD 114 of 2020
Judge: BURLEY J
Date of judgment: 24 July 2020
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE –security for costs of appeal – where appellants accept they are impecunious – whether grounds of appeal are reasonably arguable – whether granting security would stultify the appeal – whether granting security would be oppressive – applications dismissed
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 56 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 36.09
Cases cited: All Class Insurance Brokers Pty Ltd (in liquidation) v Chubb Insurance Australia Limited [2020] FCA 840 Bell Wholesale Co Ltd v Gates Export Corporation [1984] FCAFC 29; 2 FCR 1 Chapman v Luminis Pty Ltd [2002] FCA 496 Dye v Commonwealth Securities Limited [2012] FCA 992 Frigger v Kitay [2019] FCA 624 Hardingham v RP Data Pty Limited [2019] FCA 2075 Hardingham v RP Data Pty Limited (No 2) [2019] FCA 2138 Hardingham v RP Data Pty Limited (No 3) [2020] FCA 868 Jackamarra v Krakouer [1988] HCA 27; 195 CLR 516 John Caines Management Pty Ltd v Adrenalin International Powersports Pty Ltd [2004] FCA 747 Pioneer Park Pty Ltd v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited [2007] NSWCA 344 Tran v The Commonwealth [2009] FCA 921
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate