Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NWQR v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 1077 Review of: Application for judicial review of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Decision Re NWQR and Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs (2019/8478) delivered on 3 March 2020 by Senior Member M Griffin QC
File number(s): NSD 407 of 2020
Judge(s): BROMWICH J
Date of judgment: 29 July 2020
Catchwords: MIGRATION – application for judicial review of decision of Administrative Appeals Tribunal not to revoke the mandatory cancellation of visa – where delegate of the Minister not satisfied there was another reason to revoke cancellation – whether Tribunal took into account all of the impediments the applicant would face upon return to Tonga – whether Tribunal failed to discharge its statutory task in purporting to give effect to principles in Direction 79 in forming its revocation decision – no jurisdictional error by Tribunal in considering evidence – Tribunal considered mandatory considerations – principles in Direction 79 not intended to operate as a mandatory relevant consideration – application dismissed
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth), s 501(3A), Direction no. 79 under s 499
Cases cited: Craig v South Australia (1995) 184 CLR 163 FKP18 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 1555 FYBR v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCAFC 185; 374 ALR 601 McAuliffe v Secretary, Department of Social Security [1992] FCA 483; 28 ALD 609 Minister for Home Affairs v Buadromo [2018] FCAFC 151; 267 FCR 320 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v DRP17 [2018] FCAFC 198; 267 FCR 492 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Obele [2010] FCA 1445 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZRKT [2013] FCA 317; 212 FCR 99
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate