Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Bryant, in the matter of Gunns Limited (in liq) (receivers and managers appointed) v Bluewood Industries Pty Ltd (No 2) [2020] FCA 1082 File number: WAD 540 of 2015
Judge: DAVIES J
Date of judgment: 30 July 2020
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – pre-judgment interest – unfair preference claims context – when demand was made for purposes of determining when cause of action arose under s 51A(1)(a) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) – whether liquidator's demand must relate specifically to all payments within "single transaction" pursuant to s 588FF(3) COSTS – application for indemnity costs – multiple Calderbank offers – notice of offer to compromise under r 25.01(1) of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) (Rules) – whether defendant unreasonably rejected Calderbank offers – whether circumstances justified order inconsistent with presumption in favour of indemnity costs order in r 25.14(3) of the Rules – discretion not exercised on facts of case COSTS – apportionment of costs – where plaintiffs abandoned issue in dispute at the beginning of trial – where significant overlap with factual substratum relevant to a remaining issue in dispute – apportionment not appropriate on facts of case – 20% discount on costs awarded
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 588FA, 588FF Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 51A(1)(a) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 1.35, 25.01(1), 25.14
Cases cited: Anchorage Capital Partners Pty Limited v ACPA Pty Ltd (No 2) [2018] FCAFC 112 Bryant, in the matter of Gunns Limited (in liq) (receivers and managers appointed) v Bluewood Industries Pty Ltd [2020] FCA 714 Capital Finance Australia Limited v Tolcher [2007] FCAFC 185; 164 FCR 83 Ford Motor Company of Australia Ltd v Lo Presti [2009] WASCA 115; 41 WAR 1 IFTC Broking Services Limited v Commissioner of Taxation [2010] FCAFC 31; 78 ATR 606 Industrial Galvanizers Corporation Pty Ltd v Safe Direction Pty Ltd (No 2) [2018] FCA 1612 Kooee Communications Pty Ltd v Primus Telecommunications (No 2) [2011] FCAFC 141 Marriner v Australian Super Developments Pty Ltd [2016] VSCA 141 PKT Technologies Pty Ltd (formerly known as Fairlight.au Pty Ltd) v Peter Vogel Instruments Pty Ltd (No 2) [2020] FCAFC 46 Rakic v Johns Lyng Insurance Building Solutions (Victoria) Pty Ltd (Trustee) (No 2) [2016] FCA 783 Robinson v Kenny (No 2) [2015] FCA 2 Shaw v Jarldorn (1999) 76 SASR 28 Star v O'Brien (1996) 40 NSWLR 695 Sydney Equine Coaches Pty Ltd v Gorst [2017] FCAFC 34 Trustee for The MTGI Trust v Johnston (No 2) [2016] FCAFC 19 Visscher v Teekay Shipping (Australia) Pty Ltd (No 2) [2014] FCAFC 19
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate