Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
CRK16 v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCA 1114 Appeal from: CRK16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCCA 2513
File number: VID 1378 of 2018
Judge: KENNY J
Date of judgment: 4 August 2020
Catchwords: COSTS – whether costs should be costs in the cause where extension of time granted and appeal dismissed – whether costs should be fixed or as agreed or assessed – agreed or assessed costs ordered
Legislation: Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth)
Cases cited: Azaria Family Day Care Pty Ltd v Secretary, Department of Education and Training [2018] FCA 1640 Bitek Pty Ltd v IConnect Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 506 BTN16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCA 1354 CLJ15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 1638 DHP19 v Secretary of the Department of Health (No 2) [2019] FCA 1531 Hurd v Zomojo Pty Ltd [2015] FCAFC 147 James v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (No 2) [2015] FCA 599 Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72 Re Mersey Railway Co (No 1) (1888) 37 Ch D 610 Ruddock v Vadarlis [2001] FCA 1865 Sea Shepherd Australia Ltd v Western Australia [2014] WASC 66 Twentyman v Secretary, Department of Social Services [2018] FCA 1892
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate