Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
FAK19 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 1124 Review of: QDWQ v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] AATA 4622
File number: SAD 279 of 2019
Judge: CHARLESWORTH J
Date of judgment: 7 August 2020
Catchwords: MIGRATION – application for judicial review of a migration decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal made in the exercise of its powers of review under s 500 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – where applicant's visa cancelled in the mandatory exercise of the power confirmed by s 501(3A) of the Act – where a delegate of the respondent refused to revoke the cancellation decision under s 501CA(4) of the Act – where the Tribunal affirmed the delegate's decision – whether the Tribunal failed to engage with the reasons advanced by the applicant as to why the cancellation decision should be revoked – whether Tribunal failed to consider the applicant's submission that he was a person in respect of whom Australia owed non-refoulement obligations under international law – whether Tribunal erred by giving less weight to Australia's international law obligations because of an erroneous assumption that the existence of the obligations would be more fully explored if and when the applicant applied for a protection visa – whether Tribunal failed to comply with a direction issued under s 499 of the Act – whether the Tribunal failed to give genuine consideration to the applicant's written statement as to his prospects of rehabilitation
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) ss 42, 43 Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 5, 14, 35A, 36, 45, 65, 79, 189, 197C, 198, 474, 476A, 499, 500, 501, 501(3A), 501BA, 501CA
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate