Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Uolilo v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCA 1135 Application for judicial review: Uolilo and Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs (Migration) [2019] AATA 5411
File number: NSD 42 of 2020
Judgment of: KATZMANN J
Date of judgment: 7 August 2020
Catchwords: MIGRATION — application for judicial review of decision of Administrative Appeals Tribunal affirming decision of Minister's delegate to refuse application for a Partner (Migrant) (Class BC) visa under s 501(1) of Migration Act 1958 (Cth) — where no dispute that applicant failed the character test, whether failure to exercise discretion not to refuse visa application affected by jurisdictional error — whether leave should be granted to amend application to claim that Minister erred by failing "to exercise jurisdiction regarding the extradition of the applicant to Samoa within a reasonable time and the arbitrary and indefinite detention of the applicant, contrary to law" — whether Tribunal erred by finding that Australia's non-refoulement obligations were unnecessary — whether Tribunal limited consideration of risk of harm in country of nationality to "the concept of non-refoulement and the international obligations framework"
Legislation: Extradition Act 1988 (Cth) ss 12, 15B, 16, 22 Extradition (Samoa) Regulations 2010 (Cth) reg 4 Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 48A, 189, 196, 197C, 198, 499, 501 Migration and Maritime Powers Legislation Amendment (Resolving the Asylum Legacy Caseload) Act 2014 (Cth) Sch 5, Pt 1, Div 1 Explanatory Memorandum, Migration and Maritime Powers Legislation Amendment (Resolving the Asylum Legacy Caseload) Bill 2014 (Cth
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate