Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Kessly v Beadle as Trustee of the Bankrupt Estate of Evangelina Francisca Kessly (No 3) [2020] FCA 1137 File number: NSD 1933 of 2019
Judgment of: BURLEY J
Date of judgment: 7 August 2020
Catchwords: COSTS – lump sum costs order
Cases cited: Kessly v Beadle as Trustee of the Bankrupt Estate of Evangelina Francisca Kessly [2020] FCA 607 Kessly v Beadle as Trustee of the Bankrupt Estate of Evangelina Francisca Kessly (No 2) [2020] FCA 975
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area General and Personal Insolvency
Number of paragraphs: 5
Date of last submissions: 31 July 2020
Date of hearing: Determined on the papers
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr C. J. Bevan
Solicitor for the Applicant: John D. Bingham Solicitor
Solicitor for the Respondent: Ms A. Kozary of Piper Alderman
Counsel for the Intervener: Mr P. Afshar
Solicitor for the Intervener: Benjamin Khoury Solicitors and Attorneys
ORDERS NSD 1933 of 2019
BETWEEN: EVANGELINA FRANCISCA KESSLY Applicant
AND: KRISTEN BEADLE AS TRUSTEE OF THE BANKRUPT ESTATE OF EVANGELINA FRANCISCA KESSLY Respondent
BENJAMIN & KHOURY PTY LTD Intervener
order made by: BURLEY J DATE OF ORDER: 7 AUGUST 2020
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. Pursuant to r 40.02(b) of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) the costs awarded in order 5 of the orders made on 10 July 2020 are fixed in the sum of $27,038.15. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
BURLEY J: 1 In these proceedings I have delivered two earlier judgments: Kessly v Beadle as Trustee of the Bankrupt Estate of Evangelina Francisca Kessly [2020] FCA 607 was published on 8 May 2020, and Kessly v Beadle as Trustee of the Bankrupt Estate of Evangelina Francisca Kessly (No 2) [2020] FCA 975 was published on 10 July 2020. These reasons use the definitions in those judgments. 2 In order 5 made on 10 July 2020 I directed that the parties file evidence and submissions in relation to the residual question of the amount of BK's costs in these proceedings, which the Court would assess on the papers. BK and Mrs Kessly have filed evidence and submissions in accordance with those directions. 3 The total amount of costs sought by BK is $31,809.59, including counsel fees and printing costs but excluding work performed by BK or its employees. That amount is supported by the affidavit of Werrdan Reginald Khoury sworn on 17 July 2020, which annexes the tax invoices issued by counsel. 4 Having regard to the submissions advanced, in my view the amount sought by BK should be discounted by 15 per cent to take into account the likely rebate for GST, and to reduce the amount sought for photocopying in accordance with the National Guide to Discretionary Items in Bills of Costs. 5 Accordingly, I will order that Mrs Kessly pay BK's costs assessed in a lump sum amount of $27,038.15. I certify that the preceding five (5) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment of the Honourable Justice Burley.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate