Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
DKN20 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 1158 Appeal from: Application for judicial review of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal decision delivered on 3 April 2020
File number(s): VID 241 of 2020
Judge(s): PERRY J
Date of judgment: 12 August 2020
Catchwords: MIGRATION – application for judicial review of decision of Administrative Appeals Tribunal affirming delegate's decision not to revoke mandatory cancellation of applicant's visa on character grounds – whether Tribunal failed to give proper consideration to best interests of minor child – whether Tribunal failed to properly consider medical evidence and therefore applicant's mental health issues – where applicant seeks to rely upon medical evidence not before the Tribunal to challenge findings of fact – whether Tribunal erred in assessing the seriousness of the applicant's offending – whether Tribunal failed properly to appreciate the impediments the applicant would face if deported and their impact on his loved ones – application dismissed
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 37AF(1)(a), 48B, 501(3A),(6),(7), 501C(3)(b), 501CA
Cases cited: Ali v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCA 538 ASI17 v Minister for Immigration [2019] FCA 1235 AVQ15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 133; (2018) 266 FCR 83 BRT19 v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCA 449 BSJ16 v Minister for Immigration [2017] FCAFC 78; (2017) 252 FCR 82 BYA17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCAFC 44; (2019) 269 FCR 94 Craig v South Australia [1995] HCA 58; (1995) 184 CLR 163 Director of Public Prosecutions (Vic) v Perry [2016] VSCA 152; (2016) 50 VR 686 DQM18 v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCAFC 110 EVK18 v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCAFC 49 FYBR v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCAFC 185; (2019) 374 ALR 601 Hands v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 225; (2018) 267 FCR 628 Minister for Home Affairs v Buadromo [2018] FCAFC 151; (2018) 267 FCR 320 Minister for Home Affairs v HSKJ [2018] FCAFC 217; 266 FCR 591 Minister for Home Affairs v Omar [2019] FCAFC 188; (2019) 373 ALR 569 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZIAI [2009] HCA 39; (2009) 83 ALJR 1123 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Rajalingam [1999] FCA 719; (1999) 93 FCR 220 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf [2001] HCA 30; (2001) 206 CLR 323 Minister for Immigration v Tesic [2017] FCAFC 93; 251 FCR 23 Navoto v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCAFC 135 Oluwafemi v Minister for Home Affairs [2018] FCA 1389 R v Butcher [1986] VR 43; (1985) 16 A Crim R 1 Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; ex parte Applicant S20/2002 [2003] HCA 30; (2003) 77 ALJR 1165 Shi v Migration Agents Registration Authority [2008] HCA 31; (2008) 235 CLR 286 Suleiman v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 594 Te Puke v Minister for Immigration [2015] FCA 398; (2015) 230 FCR 499 Tickner v Chapman [1995] FCA 1726; (1995) 57 FCR 451 Vaitaiki v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs [1998] FCA 5; (1998) 150 ALR 608 Viane v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 116; (2018) 263 FCR 531 Walker v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCA 909 WZAVW v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 760
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate